Comparison
Shikigami vs Wattfare
A factual side by side of two tools in Hosting & Devtools. Figures come from each product’s own site.
Shikigami
ListedAn agentic IDE for running a pack of AI coding agents (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and opencode, with local models via Ollama) in parallel, each in its own isolated git...
Wattfare
ListedUsers connect, set a spending cap, and you call any model through one SDK, charged to them, not you.
| Shikigami | Wattfare | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hosting & Devtools | Hosting & Devtools |
| Pricing model | Not disclosed | Freemium |
| Starting price | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Techavy score | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
About Shikigami
An agentic IDE for running a pack of AI coding agents (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and opencode, with local models via Ollama) in parallel, each in its own isolated git worktree, each resumable. A desktop app to review their work: built-in editor, terminals, git, databases, and Docker. Free. macOS, Linux & Windows. Shikigami: Run coding agents in parallel Skip to content.
About Wattfare
Users connect, set a spending cap, and you call any model through one SDK, charged to them, not you. OpenAI-compatible Works with the Vercel AI SDK ~5-min integration. One button connects a user's inference budget to your app, metered, capped, and revocable. The problem AI costs are the one line item you can't predict. Every AI app makes the same uncomfortable bet: price high enough to survive your power users, ration usage so nobody hurts you, or quietly lose money on the heavy ones.
Neither placement on this page is paid. Outbound links are nofollow. How we rate tools