InterviewWatch vs Monologue

The InterviewWatch agent flags AI assistance, hidden overlays, extra displays and remote control during a live interview, then signs a tamper-evident report.

Between our turns, we think, and that thinking is what keeps a long conversation coherent, what surfaces real value, what lets us hold a thread across the whole hour.

About InterviewWatch

The InterviewWatch agent flags AI assistance, hidden overlays, extra displays and remote control during a live interview, then signs a tamper-evident report. An agent runs on the candidate's machine during the interview and flags AI assistants, hidden overlays, remote control and virtual devices as they appear. Why it matters Interview cheating stopped being an edge case. If your interviews aren't monitored, you may already be extending offers on answers that were never the candidate's. Across 19,368 technical interviews, 38.5% of candidates were flagged for AI-assisted cheating, and the rate climbed from 9% to 45% in a single quarter.

About Monologue

Between our turns, we think, and that thinking is what keeps a long conversation coherent, what surfaces real value, what lets us hold a thread across the whole hour. They may carry frontier-level intelligence, but the moment you put them into a long, high-stakes conversation they bottleneck: no room to reason between turns, no memory of a rule set six turns ago, no coherent thread across half an hour. Monologue lets a real-time voice model think in chunks while the user is still speaking, so its next move is deliberate and informed by everything that came before, without skyrocketing the per-minute price to a level nobody can afford in production.