CI/Lock vs Wattfare

CI/lock collects trusted telemetry across every checkpoint between commit and production, CI/CD builds, security scans (SAST/DAST/SBOM), runtime + cluster integrity...

Users connect, set a spending cap, and you call any model through one SDK, charged to them, not you.

About CI/Lock

CI/lock collects trusted telemetry across every checkpoint between commit and production, CI/CD builds, security scans (SAST/DAST/SBOM), runtime + cluster integrity (Falco, Linkerd mTLS, kube-bench), and continuous compliance (CSPM, FIPS, STIG). Signed as in-toto evidence for FedRAMP 20x, the EU Cyber Resilience Act, NIST 800-204D, SLSA, CMMC, and human-controlled cryptographic gates for AI-agent workflows. Witness-compatible, built on the rookery attestor factory. The DSSE + in-toto envelopes CI/lock emits are the same shape across every stage.

About Wattfare

Users connect, set a spending cap, and you call any model through one SDK, charged to them, not you. OpenAI-compatible Works with the Vercel AI SDK ~5-min integration. One button connects a user's inference budget to your app, metered, capped, and revocable. The problem AI costs are the one line item you can't predict. Every AI app makes the same uncomfortable bet: price high enough to survive your power users, ration usage so nobody hurts you, or quietly lose money on the heavy ones.