Skip to content
Launch

Comparison

alt-tabr vs Statey

A factual side by side of two tools in Maker Productivity. Figures come from each product’s own site.

alt-tabr

Listed

alt-tabr swaps the standard Command Tab app switcher on macOS for one that lists each individual window, including minimised ones, while using very little memory.

Statey

Listed

Shared, structured state across Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT. Validated records, versioned schema, every change attributed to the human or agent that made it. MCP-native,...

alt-tabr compared with Statey
 alt-tabrStatey
CategoryMaker ProductivityMaker Productivity
Pricing modelPaidFreemium
Starting price9 USD launch priceNot disclosed
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsmacOSNot disclosed
Techavy scoreNot rated yetNot rated yet

About alt-tabr

alt-tabr is a native window switcher for macOS 13 and later, written entirely in Rust and running on both Apple silicon and Intel Macs. It hooks into the familiar Command Tab shortcut but shows every open window rather than just apps, and it restores minimised windows when they are selected. Three visual themes are offered: one that hangs from the camera notch, a carousel and a Liquid Glass style. The app needs only the Accessibility permission, never screen recording, and collects no analytics. In the maker's own benchmarks against AltTab, it used far less memory, CPU time and energy. It sells for a 9 USD launch price, normally 29 USD, with lifetime updates.

About Statey

Shared, structured state across Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT. Validated records, versioned schema, every change attributed to the human or agent that made it. MCP-native, hosted, free to start. Query it next week from Cursor and the same record answers, even if an agent changed it in between, because every change is attributed. One hosted database, every MCP client, no server to run. Agent-driven work needs a data layer built for it. Each one trades away something a real database was always better at:.

Neither placement on this page is paid. Outbound links are nofollow. How we rate tools