Comparison
LLM Status vs Marginal
A factual side by side of two tools in Hosting & Devtools. Figures come from each product’s own site.
LLM Status
ListedTrack where every AI model is used across your apps, and get warned before one is deprecated or retired.
Marginal
ListedTrack every LLM call's cost and slice it by customer, feature, model, any field you define.
| LLM Status | Marginal | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hosting & Devtools | Hosting & Devtools |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Techavy score | Not rated yet | Not rated yet |
About LLM Status
Track where every AI model is used across your apps, and get warned before one is deprecated or retired. Run mm for the full terminal dashboard: it scans the current repo on launch, then you arrow through every model it calls, browse the registry, and see what's new, live. Both pull the signed registry from cdn.llmstatus.ai once, then run offline. The Here and What's New tabs read straight off the signed registry, no account, works offline.
About Marginal
Track every LLM call's cost and slice it by customer, feature, model, any field you define. Marginal tracks the cost of every LLM call and slices it by the fields you care about, customer, feature, model. Cost is computed server-side, usage in, dollars out. Every API request is logged with its outcome, accepted counts, rejected events and why, stripped keys, unpriced models. The SDKs are zero-dependency, buffered, fire-and-forget: track() never throws and never blocks your request path.
Neither placement on this page is paid. Outbound links are nofollow. How we rate tools