docs.dev vs HeimWall

Point your coding agent at your repo and your docs; it opens a docs branch, your team reviews on the rendered page, publishing is a commit. Runs on your Cloudflare, no...

Signal, not surveillance. See how your engineers use Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot: catch leaked secrets, PII, and confidential data, without blocking them or reading...

About docs.dev

Point your coding agent at your repo and your docs; it opens a docs branch, your team reviews on the rendered page, publishing is a commit. Runs on your Cloudflare, no platform fee, no metered AI. Reviews, branches, and rollbacks come free, because it is just git. Your content in their database, and an export button you hope works when you leave. Writing AI is the agent you already have; reader-facing AI runs on your Workers AI.

About HeimWall

Signal, not surveillance. See how your engineers use Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot: catch leaked secrets, PII, and confidential data, without blocking them or reading their prompts. Nothing sits in your send path, your prompt reaches the tool untouched, and what you type into an AI tool is never sent to us. To read your prompt before it is sent, the app reads the composer through the macOS Accessibility API and watches the clipboard. Accessibility is a wide permission and macOS does not offer a narrower one for this.