dmx vs HeimWall

dmx is an open source AI-native engineering harness. It runs as an MCP server inside Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, or any IDE that speaks the Model Context Protocol, and...

Signal, not surveillance. See how your engineers use Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot: catch leaked secrets, PII, and confidential data, without blocking them or reading...

About dmx

dmx is an open source AI-native engineering harness. It runs as an MCP server inside Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, or any IDE that speaks the Model Context Protocol, and wraps your AI workflows in structured, verifiable loops. The model is fast and often impressive, but the output is inconsistent. Quality depends on how you prompted, whether you remembered to run tests, whether the spec was clear before the first line of code was written. There's just you and the model and whatever happened to work that day.

About HeimWall

Signal, not surveillance. See how your engineers use Cursor, Claude Code, and Copilot: catch leaked secrets, PII, and confidential data, without blocking them or reading their prompts. Nothing sits in your send path, your prompt reaches the tool untouched, and what you type into an AI tool is never sent to us. To read your prompt before it is sent, the app reads the composer through the macOS Accessibility API and watches the clipboard. Accessibility is a wide permission and macOS does not offer a narrower one for this.