Bacon vs Wolbarg

Bacon is an ad network for AI coding tools. Install the plugin, see occasional clearly-labeled ads in your terminal, and earn a share of the revenue your attention makes....

Why most local multi-agent workflows don't need PostgreSQL for semantic memory, and when they actually do.

About Bacon

Bacon is an ad network for AI coding tools. Install the plugin, see occasional clearly-labeled ads in your terminal, and earn a share of the revenue your attention makes. It's free, opt-in, and your prompt never leaves your machine, only a coarse intent signal does. > how do i add auth to this next.js app without rolling my own? Bacon just lets a few of them earn, and you decide how few. It's found money for work you were doing anyway, not a paycheck.

About Wolbarg

Why most local multi-agent workflows don't need PostgreSQL for semantic memory, and when they actually do. When people build an AI application, the database choice looks obvious: PostgreSQL, maybe Redis for caching, maybe pgvector for semantic search. This post is about that decision, and why SQLite is often the better fit for local multi-agent workflows. Local agents usually run on one machine, one process, maybe a handful of agents sharing context. Strip away the marketing and the list is short: low latency, simplicity (no migrations, users, or roles to wrestle with), local execution (offline works, no cloud bill), reliability (transactions, not half-written memories), and persistence (a file you can copy, back up, or delete).